We have essentially managed to catch him between the European Ruby conference and Scotland on Rails.
The day was very much an introductory day, with a few little tidbits. We set up our own little Sandbox project to work within. I have opted to start with something I have been looking to do for sometime which is a VTES CCG deck-building program. (VTES is a vampire based collectable card game which is where the Vampire Software comes from. It will be something I'll get into sourceforge soon!)
David also explained a bit more about Ruby objects and rails functional testing. The former was a good tidy up of what I already knew/had worked out. The latter was a good formalisation of what they are trying to achieve, as whilst I had done some functional testing in rails before, most was concentrated on the unit testing. (A note here. functional testing can mean different things in different frameworks. Some prefer to think of functional testing in Rails as just an extension of Unit testing specifically for controllers, as in other frameworks, functional tests are what Rails calls Integration tests).
At this point, David also gave us a reason for NOT using scaffold generation to generate model backed controllers and views. Personally, I like this approach (I think that code which writes code is a very good thing) but he says that as you get further into rails, you end up removing more from scaffold generated code, than you would write that could have been auto-generated, and as such prefers to suggest that you should learn writing from scratch. With my limited experience, I'll take a rain-check on making a confirmed decision, but I will (for now), stick with auto-generation when it comes to a model backed controllers.
One thing here though that I did discover is in Rails 2.0.2, if you have generated your model first, and then run script/generate scaffold
1) script/generate scaffold
2) not do script/generate model
3) rename the migration file and class within it before running
This was annoying, as before when I did this, it used to ask if I wanted to replace it, and it generates everything up to the point where it barfs, but nothing after it. Oh well, I suppose it is something I can get used to. Just think I'll need to read up on the new stuff for 2.0.2 sooner than I expected. :)
We also touched upon the new Initializers, which look very useful for keeping track of requirements. I hope we might look at those again.
The final thing to talk about here was how to implement Composite Primary Keys. Firstly - why? ActiveRecord is never going to support them.
Secondly - However, we have a big legacy database using them extensively, so David showed us how to implement Dr. Nic's composite_primary_keys gem (requiring it via an Initializer!). I won't explain it all here, but the scratchpad attempt I made of it worked well. (to install it though - sudo gem install composite_primary_keys)
And finally, speaking of Legacy databases. In Rails 'type' is a reserved column type for when using Single Table Inheritance, and ActiveRecord expects to use this as a class name. We have fallen foul of this with our legacy database, but fall foul of it no more. In the model put:
and hey presto! you can use the 'type' column in your legacy schema as planned.
That will do for now. Let's see what the next day brings.